Remarkable insights into modern bird origins from the Maastrichtian type area (north-east Belgium, south-east Netherlands)

  • Daniel J. Field Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; and Museum of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1786-0352
  • Juan Benito Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Sarah Werning Department of Anatomy, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA, 50266, USA
  • Albert Chen Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Pei-Chen Kuo Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Abi Crane Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Klara E. Widrig Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Daniel T. Ksepka Bruce Museum, Greenwich, CT, USA
  • John W.M. Jagt Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Keywords: Birds, Neornithes, Asteriornis, Janavis, palaeohistology

Abstract

For centuries, fossils from the Maastrichtian type locality and adjacent quarries have provided key evidence of vertebrate diversity during the latest Cretaceous, yet until recently the Maastrichtian type area had revealed no important insights into the evolutionary history of birds, one of the world’s most conspicuous groups of extant tetrapods. With the benefit of high-resolution micro-CT scanning, two important avian fossils from the Maastrichtian type area have now been examined in detail, offering profound, complementary insights into the evolutionary history of birds. The holotype specimens of these new taxa, Janavis finalidens Benito, Kuo, Widrig, Jagt and Field, 2022, and Asteriornis maastrichtensis Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka, 2020, were originally collected in the late 1990s, but were only investigated in detail more than twenty years later. Collectively, Janavis and Asteriornis provide some of the best evidence worldwide regarding the factors that influenced stem bird extinction and crown bird survivorship through the Cretaceous-Palaeogene transition, as well as insights into the origins of key anatomical features of birds such as an extensively pneumatised postcranial skeleton, a kinetic palate, and a toothless beak. Asteriornis also provides scarce evidence of a Cretaceous-aged divergence time calibration within the avian crown group, while together, Janavis and Asteriornis constitute the only documented co-occurrence of crown birds and non-neornithine avialans. Here, we review key insights into avian evolutionary history provided by these discoveries from the Maastrichtian stratotype, document undescribed and newly discovered Maastrichtian fossils potentially attributable to Avialae and provide the first histological data for the holotype of Asteriornis, illustrating its skeletal maturity at the time of its death.

References

Acosta Hospitaleche, C. & Worthy, T.H., 2021. New data on the Vegavis iaai holotype from the Maastrichtian of Antarctica. Cretaceous Research 124: 104818. DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.104818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agnolín, F.L., Egli, F.B., Chatterjee, S., Marsà, J.A.G. & Novas, F.E., 2017. Vegaviidae, a new clade of southern diving birds that survived the K/T boundary. The Science of Nature 104(11-12): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Álvarez-Herrera, G.P., Rozadilla, S., Agnolín, F.L. & Novas, F.E., 2023. Jaw anatomy of Vegavis iaai (Clarke, etal, 2005) from the Late Cretaceous Antarctica, and its phylogenetic implications. Geobios 83: 11–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.geobios.2023.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angst, D., Chinsamy-Turan, A., Steel, L. & Hume, J., 2017. Bone histology sheds new light on the ecology of the dodo (Raphus cucullatus, Aves, Columbiformes). Scientific Reports 7(1): 7993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benito, J., Chen, A., Wilson, L.E., Bhullar, B.-A.S., Burnham, D. & Field, D.J., 2022a. 40 new specimens of Ichthyornis provide unprecedented insight into the postcranial morphology of crownward stem group birds. PeerJ 10: e13919. DOI: 10.1101/2022.01.11.475364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benito, J., Kuo, P.C., Widrig, K.E., Jagt, J.W.M. & Field, D.J., 2022b. Cretaceous ornithurine supports a neognathous crown bird ancestor. Nature 612(7938): 7938 100–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berv, J.S. & Field, D.J., 2018. Genomic signature of an avian Lilliput effect across the K-Pg extinction. Systematic Biology 67(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blondel, J. & Mourer-Chauviré, C., 1998. Evolution and history of the western Palaearctic avifauna. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13(12): 488–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bourdon, E., Castanet, J., Ricqlès, A.de, Scofield, P., Tennyson, P., Lamrous, H. & Cubo, J., 2009. Bone growth marks reveal protracted from in New Zealand kiwi (Aves, Apterygidae). Biology Letters 5(5): 639–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bout, R.G. & Zweers, G.A., 2011. The role of cranial kinesis in birds. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, A. Molecular and Integrative Physiology 131(1): 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braun, E.L. & Kimball, R.T., 2021. Data types and the phylogeny of Neoaves. Birds 2(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brocklehurst, N. & Field, D.J., 2016, Tip dating and Bayes factors provide insight into the divergences of crown bird clades across the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 291: 20232618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, J.W., Rest, J.S., García-Moreno, J., Sorenson, M.D. & Mindell, D.P., 2008. Strong mitochondrial DNA support for a Cretaceous origin of modern avian lineages. BMC Biology 6(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brownstein, C.D., 2024. A juvenile bird with possible crown-group affinities from a dinosaur-rich Cretaceous ecosystem in North America. BMC Ecology and Evolution 24(1): 20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burton, M.G.P., Benson, R.B.J. & Field, D.J., 2023. Direct quantification of skeletal pneumaticity reveals ecological drivers of a key avian trait. Proceedings of the Royal Society B290(1995): 20230160. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0160.Google Scholar

Chiappe, L., 2002. Osteology of the flightless Patagopteryx deferrariisi from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia (Argentina). In: Chiappe, L. & Witmer, L.M. (eds): Mesozoic birds: above the heads of dinosaurs. University of California Press (Berkeley): 281–316.Google Scholar

Chinsamy, A., Chiappe, L.M. & Dodson, P., 1994. Growth rings in Mesozoic birds. Nature 368(196): 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chinsamy, A. & Elzanowski, A., 2001. Evolution of growth pattern in birds. Nature 412(402): 403–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chinsamy-Turan, A., 2005. The microstructure of dinosaur bone: deciphering biology with fine-scale techniques. Johns Hopkins University Press (Baltimore): pp. 185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claramunt, S. & Cracraft, J., 2015. A new time tree reveals Earth history 19;s imprint on the evolution of modern birds. Science Advances 1(11): e1501005. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1501005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, J.A., 2004. Morphology, phylogenetic taxonomy, and systematics of Ichthyornis and Apatornis (Avialae: Ornithurae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 286: 1–179. DOI: 10.1206/0003-0090(2004)286.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, J.A., Chatterjee, S., Li, Z., Riede, T., Agnolin, F., Goller, F., Isasi, M.P., Martinioni, D.R., Mussel, F.J. & Novas, F.E., 2016. Fossil evidence of the avian vocal organ from the Mesozoic. Nature 538(7626): 502–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clarke, J.A. & Norell, M.A., 2002. The morphology and phylogenetic position of Apsaravis ukhaana from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia. American Museum Novitates 3387: 1–46.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, J.A., Tambussi, C.P., Noriega, J.I., Erickson, G.M. & Ketcham, R.A., 2005. Definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous. Nature 433(7023): 7023 305–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cooke, R., Gearty, W., Chapman, A.S., Dunic, J., Edgar, G.J., Lefcheck, J.S., Rilov, G., McClain, C.R., Stuart-Smith, R.D., Kathleen Lyons, S. & Bates, A.E., 2022. Anthropogenic disruptions to longstanding patterns of trophic-size structure in vertebrates. Nature Ecology & Evolution 6(6): 684–692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cracraft, J., 2001. Avian evolution, Gondwana biogeography and the Cretaceous-Tertiary mass extinction event. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 268(1466): 459–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cracraft, J., 1988. The major clades of birds, The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods. In: Benton, M.J., 1, Oxford University Press (Oxford): 339–361.Google Scholar

Cracraft, J. & Clarke, J., 2001, The basal clades of modern birds. In: Gauthier, J. & Gall, L. F. New perspectives on the origin and early evolution of birds. Proceedings of the International Symposium in honor of John H. Ostrom. Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University (New Haven): pp. 143–156.Google Scholar

Crane, A., Benito, J., Chen, A., Musser, G., Torres, C.R., Clarke, J.A., Lautenschlager, S., Ksepka, D.T. & Field, D.J., 2023. Taphonomic damage obfuscates interpretation of the retroarticular region of the Asteriornis mandible. bioRxiv, 2023-06. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.13.544555.Google Scholar

Cubo, J., Le Roy, N., Martinez-Maza, C. & Montes, L., 2012. Paleohistological estimation of bone growth rate in extinct archosaurs. Paleobiology 38: 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Buffrénil, V. & Pascal, M., 1984. Croissance et morphogénèse postnatales de la mandibule du vison (Mustela vison Schreiber): données sur la dynamique et l’interprétation fonctionnelle de dépots osseux mandibulaires. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62: 2026–2037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dececchi, T.A. & Larsson, H.C., 2011. Assessing arboreal adaptations of bird antecedents: testing the ecological setting of the origin of the avian flight stroke. PLoS One 6(8): e22292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Drozdowska, J. & Meissner, W., 2014. Changes in endosteal cell layer number of long bones are not appropriate for ageing birds: evidence from Baltic razorbills (Alca torda Linnaeus, 1758). Zoologischer Anzeiger 253: 493–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dyke, G.J., Dortangs, R.W., Jagt, J.W.M., Mulder, E.W.A., Schulp, A.S. & Chiappe, L.M., 2002. Europe’s last Mesozoic bird. Naturwissenschaften 89(9): 408–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dyke, G.J., Schulp, A.S. & Jagt, J.W.M., 2008. Bird remains from the Maastrichtian type area (Late Cretaceous). Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 87(4): 353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enlow, D.H. & Brown, S.O., 1957. A comparative histological study of fossil and recent bone tissues Part II. Texas Journal of Science 9: 186–214.Google Scholar

Ericson, P.G., 2000. Systematics, anatomy and paleoecology of the Paleogene family Presbyornithidae (Aves: Anseriformes). PaleoBios 20: 1–23.Google Scholar

Feduccia, A., 1976. Osteological evidence for shorebird affinities of the flamingos. The Auk 93(3): 587–601.Google Scholar

Feduccia, A., 1995. Explosive evolution in Tertiary birds and mammals. Science 267(5198): 638–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Field, D.J., Benito, J., Chen, A., Jagt, J.W.M. & Ksepka, D.T., 2020b. Late Cretaceous neornithine from Europe illuminates the origins of crown birds. Nature 579(7799): 7799 397–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Field, D.J., Bercovici, A., Berv, J.S., Dunn, R., Fastovsky, D.E., Lyson, T.R., Vajda, V. & Gauthier, J.A., 2018a. Early evolution of modern birds structured by global forest collapse at the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. Current Biology 28(11): 1825–1831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, D.J., Hanson, M., Burnham, D., Wilson, L.E., Super, K., Ehret, D., Ebersole, J.A. & Bhullar, B.A.S., 2018b. Complete Ichthyornis skull illuminates mosaic assembly of the avian head. Nature 557(7703): 96–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Field, D.J., Berv, J.S., Hsiang, A.Y., Lanfear, R., Landis, M.J. & Dornburg, A., 2020a. Timing the extant avian radiation: the rise of modern birds, and the importance of modeling molecular rate variation. In: Pittman, M. & Xing, X. (eds): Pennaraptoran theropod dinosaurs: Past progress and new frontiers. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, vol. 440, pp. 159–181.Google Scholar

Field, D.J. & Hsiang, A.Y., 2018. A North American stem turaco, and the complex biogeographic history of modern birds. BMC Evolutionary Biology 18(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Field, D.J., Lynner, C., Brown, C. & Darroch, S.A., 2013. Skeletal correlates for body mass estimation in modern and fossil flying birds. PLoS ONE 8(11): e82000. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Francillon-Vieillot, H., de Buffrénil, V., Geraudie, J., Meunier, F. J., Sire, J., Zylberberg, Y. & de Ricqlès, A., 1990. Microstructure and mineralization of vertebrate skeletal tissues. In: Carter, J.G. (ed): Skeletal biomineralization: patterns, processes and evolutionarytrends. vol. 1. (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York): 471–530.Google Scholar

Gussekloo, S.W. & Bout, R.G., 2005. Cranial kinesis in palaeognathous birds. Journal of Experimental Biology 208: 3409–3419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heck, C.T. & Woodward, H.N., 2021. Intraskeletal bone growth patterns in the North Island Brown Kiwi (Apteryx mantelli): Growth mark discrepancy and implications for extinct taxa. Journal of Anatomy 239(5): 1075–1095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Howard, H., 1955. A new wading bird from the Eocene of Patagonia. American Museum Novitates 1710: 1–25.Google Scholar

Jagt, J.W.M., Mulder, E.W.A., Schulp, A.S., Dortangs, R.W. & Fraaije, R.H.B., 2003. Dinosaurs from the Maastrichtian-type area (southeastern Netherlands, northeastern Belgium). Palevol 2(1): 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarvis, E.D., Mirarab, S., Aberer, A.J., Li, B., Houde, P., Li, C., Ho, S.Y., Faircloth, B.C., Nabholz, B., Howard, J.T. & Suh, A., 2014. Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science 346(6215): 6215 1320–1331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jollie, M.T., 1957. The head skeleton of the chicken and remarks on the anatomy of this region in other birds. Journal of Morphology 100(3): 389–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kimball, R.T., Oliveros, C.H., Wang, N., White, N.D., Barker, F.K., Field, D.J., Ksepka, D.T., Chesser, R.T., Moyle, R.G., Braun, M.J. & Brumfield, R.T., 2019. A phylogenomic supertree of birds. Diversity 11(7): 109. DOI: 10.3390/d11070109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ksepka, D.T., Stidham, T.A. & Williamson, T.E., 2017. Early Paleocene landbird supports rapid phylogenetic and morphological diversification of crown birds after the K-Pg mass extinction. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America 114(30): 8047–8052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuhl, H., Frankl-Vilches, C., Bakker, A., Mayr, G., Nikolaus, G., Boerno, S.T., Klages, S., Timmermann, B. & Gahr, M., 2021. An unbiased molecular approach using 3′-UTRs resolves the avian family-level tree of life. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38(1): 108–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuo, P.C., Benson, R.B. & Field, D.J., 2023. The influence of fossils in macroevolutionary analyses of 3D geometric morphometric data: a case study of galloanseran quadrates. Journal of Morphology 284(6): e21594. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.21594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuo, P.C., Navalón, G., Benson, R. & Field, D.J., 2024. Macroevolutionary drivers of morphological disparity in the avian quadrate. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 291(2017): 20232250. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Larson, D.W., Brown, C.M. & Evans, D.C., 2016. Dental disparity and ecological stability in bird-like dinosaurs prior to the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. Current Biology 26(10): 1325–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Livezey, B.C., 1997. A phylogenetic analysis of basal Anseriformes, the fossil Presbyornis, and the interordinal relationships of waterfowl. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 121: 361–428.Google Scholar

Longrich, N.R., Tokaryk, T. & Field, D.J., 2011. Mass extinction of birds at the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America 108(37): 15253–15257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marsh, O.C., 1880. Odontornithes: a monograph on the extinct toothed birds of North America, vol. 1. United States Government Printing Office (Washington): pp. 356 Google Scholar

Mayr, G., 2011. Two-phase extinction of, Southern Hemispheric, birds in the Cenozoic of Europe and the origin of the Neotropic avifauna. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments 91(4): 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayr, G., 2014. The Eocene Juncitarsus-its phylogenetic position and significance for the evolution and higher-level affinities of flamingos and grebes. Comptes Rendus Palevol 13(1): 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayr, G., 2022. Paleogene fossil birds (2nd edn.) Springer (Heidelberg): 251 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayr, G., De Pietri, V.L., Scofield, R.P. & Worthy, T.H., 2018. On the taxonomic composition and phylogenetic affinities of the recently proposed clade Vegaviidae Agnolín, etal, 2017 – neornithine birds from the Upper Cretaceous of the Southern Hemisphere. Cretaceous Research 86: 178–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montes, L., Castanet, J. & Cubo, J., 2010. Relationship between bone growth rate and bone tissue organization in amniotes: First test of Amprino’s rule in a phylogenetic context. Animal Biology 60(1): 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newell-Morris, L. & Sirianni, J.E., 1982. Parameters of bone growth in the fetal and infant macaque (Macaca nemestrina) humerus as documented by trichromatic bone labels. In: Dixon, A.D. & Sarnat, B.G. (eds): Factors and mechanisms influencing bone growth. Alan R. Liss (New York): pp. 243–258.Google Scholar

Norberg, U.M., 1979. Morphology of the wings, legs and tail of three coniferous forest tits, the goldcrest, and the treecreeper in relation to locomotor pattern and feeding station selection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences 287: 1019 131–165.Google Scholar

Noriega, J.I. & Tambussi, C.P., 1995. A Late Cretaceous Presbyornithidae (Aves: Anseriformes) from Vega Island, Antarctic Peninsula: Palcobiogeographic implications. Ameghiniana 32(1): 57–61.Google Scholar

O’Connor, J.K., Chiappe, L.M. & Bell, A., 2011. Pre-modern birds: avian divergences in the Mesozoic. In: Dyke, G. & Kaiser, G. (eds): Living dinosaurs: the evolutionary history of modern birds. Wiley-Blackwell (Chichester): pp. 39–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, K.M. & Larsson, H. (2004. Gulls of North America, Europe, and Asia. Princeton University Press: 544 pp. ISBN 978-0691119977. OCLC 869139988.Google Scholar

Parker, W.K., 1868, On the Structure and Development of the Skull of the Common Fowl (Gallus domesticus). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. pp. 277–280.Google Scholar

Plateau, O., Green, T.L., Gignac, P.M. & Foth, C., 2024. Comparative digital reconstruction of Pica pica and Struthio camelus and their cranial suture ontogenies. The Anatomical Record 307(1): 5–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ponton, F., Elzanowski, A., Castanet, J., Chinsamy, A., Margerie, E.de, Ricqlès, A.de & Cubo, J., 2004. Variation of the outer circumferential layer in the limb bones of birds. Acta Ornithologica 39: 137–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prum, R.O., Berv, J.S., Dornburg, A., Field, D.J., Townsend, J.P., Lemmon, E.M. & Lemmon, A.R., 2015. A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature 526(7574): 7574 569–573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pycraft, W.P., 1901. Some points in the morphology of the palate of the Neognathæ. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 28: 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ricqlès, A.J.de, Padian, K., Horner, J.R., Lamm, E.T. & Myhrvold, N., 2003. Osteohistology of Confuciusornis sanctus (Theropoda: Aves). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23: 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saupe, E.E., Farnsworth, A., Lunt, D.J., Sagoo, N., Pham, K.V. & Field, D.J., 2019. Climatic shifts drove major contractions in avian latitudinal distributions throughout the Cenozoic. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America 116(26): 12895–12900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Simonetta, A.M., 1960. On the mechanical implications of the avian skull and their bearing on the evolution and classification of birds. Quarterly Review of Biology 35: 206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slack, K.E., Jones, C.M., Ando, T., Harrison, G.L., Fordyce, R.E., Arnason, U. & Penny, D., 2006. Early penguin fossils, plus mitochondrial genomes, calibrate avian evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23(6): 1144–1155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tambussi, C.P., Degrange, F.J., De Mendoza, R.S., Sferco, E. & Santillana, S., 2019. A stem anseriform from the early Palaeocene of Antarctica provides new key evidence in the early evolution of waterfowl. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 186(3): 673–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torres, C.R., Norell, M.A. & Clarke, J.A., 2021. Bird neurocranial and body mass evolution across the end-Cretaceous mass extinction: the avian brain shape left other dinosaurs behind. Science Advances 7(31): eabg7099. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abg7099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Turner, A.H., Makovicky, P.J. & Norell, M.A., 2012. A review of dromaeosaurid systematics and paravian phylogeny. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 371: 1–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turvey, S.T., Green, O.R. & Holdaway, R.N., 2005. Cortical growth marks reveal extended juvenile development in New Zealand moa. Nature 435(7044): 940–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vellekoop, J., Kaskes, P., Sinnesael, M., Huygh, J., Déhais, T., Jagt, J.W., Speijer, R.P. & Claeys, P., 2022. A new age model and chemostratigraphic framework for the Maastrichtian type area (southeastern Netherlands, northeastern Belgium). Newsletters on Stratigraphy 55(4): 479–501. DOI: 10.1127/nos/2022/0703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, M., Li, Z. & Zhou, Z., 2017. Insight into the growth pattern and bone fusion of basal birds from an Early Cretaceous enantiornithine bird. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America 114(43): 11470–11475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wang, M. & Zhou, Z., 2017. A new adult specimen of the basalmost ornithuromorph bird Archaeorhynchus spathula (Aves: Ornithuromorpha) and its implications for early avian ontogeny. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 15(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, Y.-M., O’Connor, J.K., Li, D.-Q. & You, H.-L., 2016. New information on postcranial skeleton of the Early Cretaceous Gansus yumenensis (Aves: Ornithuromorpha). Historical Biology 28(5): 666–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Werning, S. & Nesbitt, S.J., 2016. Bone histology and growth in Stenaulorhynchus stockleyi (Archosauromorpha: Rhynchosauria) from the Middle Triassic of the Ruhuhu Basin of Tanzania. Comptes Rendus Palevol 15: 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Worthy, T.H., Degrange, F.J., Handley, W.D. & Lee, M.S., 2017. The evolution of giant flightless birds and novel phylogenetic relationships for extinct fowl (Aves, Galloanseres). Royal Society Open Science 4(10): 170975. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zheng, X., O’Connor, J.K., Wang, X., Wang, Y. & Zhou, Z., 2008. Reinterpretation of a previously described Jehol bird clarifies early trophic evolution in the Ornithuromorpha. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285(1871): 20172494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, S., Zhou, Z. & O’Connor, J.K., 2013. Anatomy of the basal ornithuromorph bird Archaeorhynchus spathula from the Early Cretaceous of Liaoning, China. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 33(1): 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Z. & Zhang, F., 2001. Two new ornithurine birds from the Early Cretaceous of western Liaoning, China. Chinese Science Bulletin 46(15): 1258–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Published
2024-05-13
How to Cite
Field , D. J., Benito , J., Werning , S., Chen , A., Kuo , P.-C., Crane , A., Widrig , K. E., Ksepka , D. T., & Jagt , J. W. (2024). Remarkable insights into modern bird origins from the Maastrichtian type area (north-east Belgium, south-east Netherlands). Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 103. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2024.11
Section
Geoperspective